I need a concise 1,000-word literature review for my Extended Project Qualification that compares forced-induction and naturally-aspirated engines. The first 500 words should synthesise the core ideas of the topic, setting out why the forced-vs-natural debate matters today. The remaining section must critically evaluate the most recent research (ideally published within the past five years), highlighting where leading authors agree, clash, or leave gaps. Within the review please address all three focal areas in turn: • Performance and power limitations – include altitude effects and the practical ceiling atmospheric pressure sets for each layout. • Fuel efficiency and gas emissions – cite quantitative findings where possible. • Reliability and maintenance costs – discuss complexity, typical failure modes, and lifecycle expenses. Draw on whichever sources are most relevant, whether peer-reviewed journals, up-to-date industry reports, or authoritative books; relevance and recency matter more than category. When you reference a claim, pinpoint the page or figure so I can verify it quickly. Deliverable: – A single 1,000-word document (Word or Google Docs) with proper in-text citations and a reference list in Harvard style. I will assess the piece on clarity of synthesis, balance of viewpoints, depth of evaluation, and use of fresh evidence.