I’m strengthening my EB2 NIW petition and the missing piece is independent, authoritative feedback on my technical projects and recent hackathon submissions. I need a seasoned reviewer who can dive into each code-base, scrutinise the documentation, benchmark performance, and then package those findings into clear, persuasive reports that highlight technical merit and national-interest value. What I expect for every project or hackathon entry: • A succinct yet thorough code-quality assessment that flags strengths, bugs, and refactoring opportunities. • Line-by-line or module-level comments where critical improvements are needed. • A review of all technical documents (readme, specs, API references) pinpointing gaps, ambiguities, and compliance issues. • Performance and functionality results—include benchmarks, stress-test data, and a short set of reproducible steps. • A concluding one-page letter I can attach to my EB2 NIW evidence file, written in professional language that underlines the project’s broader impact. I will provide repository access (GitHub), build instructions, and any context you need. Most projects are in Python and TypeScript, so familiarity with those stacks—as well as standard tools like pylint, Jest, and JMeter—will help you move faster. Turnaround per project is one week, but if you can deliver quicker without sacrificing depth, let me know. Accuracy, constructive insight, and crisp writing are paramount; these reviews will sit in front of immigration officers as part of my petition. If this matches your expertise, I’m ready to share the first repo right away.