I need a 4 000-word critical article that examines how faith, religious and spiritual interventions can be woven into clinical work for a counsellor . I want you to: * Give a clear, academically grounded critique of the Waverley Integrative Framework, concentrating on its integration methods and judging how useful those methods are in real-world practice. * Unpack the ethical minefield—client autonomy, the therapist’s own beliefs and confidentiality issues—and show how each can shape or limit the use of spirituality in therapy. * Weigh the therapeutic value and possible pitfalls of religious or spiritual techniques, with a special focus on how effectiveness shifts from one therapy modality to another (for example, CBT vs. psychodynamic vs. systemic approaches). * Anchor every argument in current research and scholarly literature, citing sources consistently and accurately. Include Churchill framework for reference The finished document should flow like a journal article—analytical yet readable, fully referenced in Harvard style, and entirely original. Include a reference list at the end and keep the language formal, critical and evidence-based. NO Ai to be used