I’m looking for a polished academic-style essay that examines the American Cancer Society website through the lens of accessibility, with special attention on how its navigation supports—or sometimes hinders—users. While navigation is the centerpiece, I also want you to weave in insights about content clarity, visual appeal, and overall user flow so the discussion feels balanced and holistic. The paper must be written in a positive, first-person “I” voice. Open with a hook and clear thesis in the very first paragraph; close by circling back to that thesis in the final paragraph. Between those bookends, ground every point in my own observations rather than formal statistics or third-party studies. Think reflective critique backed by concrete examples: describe what you notice when moving through menus, how link placement influences your journey, and which design choices either reinforce or undercut accessibility best practices. Deliverable • One well-structured essay (approx. 1,200–1,500 words is ideal, though I’m flexible) in editable document format. Acceptance criteria • First paragraph contains an engaging hook and explicit thesis. • Final paragraph succinctly restates and reinforces that thesis. • Discussion centers on navigation accessibility, with supporting notes on content and visuals. • Written entirely in first person, using my direct observations as evidence. • Flows logically, free of spelling or grammar errors. If this sounds clear, let me know how soon you can have a draft ready.