I’m putting together a series of research-driven biographies on English writers whose names regularly stirred debate, censorship hearings, or moral panic. The brief is clear: focus squarely on their public controversies and then demonstrate, with evidence, how those incidents rippled through society—shaping readership, policy, or cultural norms. Each biography should run 1,200–1,500 words and follow a consistent structure: a concise author overview, a detailed narrative of the controversy (court cases, press battles, bans, etc.), and a closing analysis of societal impact. Write in a voice that is engaging yet academically sound; think New York Review of Books rather than a textbook. APA or MLA citations are fine so long as you’re consistent. Source material must come from verifiable outlets—scholarly journals, major newspapers, archived legal documents, or the writers’ own correspondence. Unsourced anecdotes or forum posts won’t make the cut. Deliverables • Individual biography files (Word or Google Docs) for each writer • A consolidated bibliography for the entire set Acceptance criteria • Minimum five reputable sources per biography, fully cited • Clear section on societal impact, not just the scandal itself • Final text passes standard plagiarism screening (Turnitin or similar) If this approach matches your expertise, let’s discuss the shortlist of authors and timeline.